why we still need cyberpunk

William Gibson penned Neuromancer over thirty years ago, and the 1990’s ended viciously on 9/11. With the exception of cyberfeminism, I wrote off “cyberpunk” as an ethic once we as a society stopped saying “cyber” and replaced the word with “online”.

Yesterday I traced partial assets of an individual I distrusted—and needed the straight dope from—from my laptop. Dating while transgender proves dangerous and a girl must protect herself!

In between I persistently beleaguered Microsoft as a career-long Linux hacker.

Once declared squatter’s rights on a piece of land I identified though data mining.

I walk with the Big Data devils to broadcast my signal, a means to an end. Twitter, Google, Amazon, and Facebook receive my data, and in exchange they amplify my cultural imperative.

And they know where the real value in data lies: Not in the records themselves but in the interconnections between them.

Emergent properties steered by unholy gods.

“Cyber”: Greek for “to steer”.

Steering a boat requires connecting the data: Position, velocity, acceleration, time. State variables alone won’t suffice.

When we get burned by Cambridge Analytica or the Russian Federation, we realize our individual technological vulnerability.

Propaganda is hacking: Implant bias, implant ideas, grow emergent outcomes. Seduction is a system intrusion.

Technological warfare and psychological warfare forever link.

Class war must proceed asymmetrically.

I only trust the Prophets, not the Church, not the State, not the Oligarchs.

And we can be prophets in cyberspace. We can create technology that liberates the world.

We can steer toward our own emergent outcomes.

We can end material scarcity.

Love forward. Program. Network. Build enterprise. Produce art. Write. Love forward.

Jam the system, and prepare to be jammed by the punks that follow you.

The 1990’s are dust, but the “system” still remains cybernetic control. Therefore resistance remains cyberpunk.

the real reason I live in an RV

Not paranoid, just a student of history.

Even CNN and President Obama are concerned about the development of authoritarianism in this country [1]. That is saying something.

I don’t just live in an RV to save money or live portably. (Both good things in my ethos).

I live in an RV primarily so I can flee to Canada or Mexico if things get bad for transgender people in the United States.

Berlin in the 1920’s welcomed transgender individuals to some extent. The city served as a hotbed of transgender medical research. By the 1930’s the Nazis started arresting LGBT people.

I do not trust the “religious” right. They do not understand Christianity. They do not know Christ. Pharisees, the lot of them. Given power they would lock me up or execute me.

I do not trust current trends to protect my liberty. While I 100% trust and expect California to intervene on my behalf, a U.S. state can only do so much.

Going to stash money in the Royal Bank of Canada soon, in case my U.S. assets are frozen.

I’ve memorized the highways to Canada so I can turn off my smart phone if I flee. (To prevent tracking). Already know how to drive to Mexico from where I live.

Keep my RV in good repair for sudden travel, with my propane tanks and battery array full. Keep the fuel tank in my truck at least half full.

See Also

RV chic

References

  1. http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/09/opinions/obama-hitler-germany-democracy-warning-ben-ghiat-opinion/index.html

work of art, work in progress

I believe that many trans individuals simply want the freedom to be who they are.

I want so much more! Am creating a full-blown work of art out of my personality, my appearance, my grace, my spirituality, and my femininity.

frugal anarchy

Of all the systems that we seek freedom within and from, none pervades our lives as much as the “econosphere” we inhabit. By “econosphere”, I mean the global network of economic activity whose nodes are individuals and whose edges are trade relationships between individuals.

Even if we had no government, we’d still likely be trading goods and services. Therefore the econosphere may be more significant than the existence of government to those seeking freedom. Anarchists traditionally focus on the elimination of government as the means of increasing freedom. However, I propose that limited reliance on the econosphere is a more comprehensive goal for anarchistic thinking.

There are two paths to individual economic freedom in a free-market economy: The first is to be wealthy enough to afford whatever transactions one wants to make whenever one wants to make them. This is unfortunately out of reach for most people. The second path is voluntary frugality; limiting the transactions one makes to well thought out targets, such that utility and satisfaction of purchases is maximized and very few dollars are spent on things outside those targets.

This strategy of voluntary frugality limits individual reliance on the econosphere by limiting the amount of money that an individual needs to acquire and spend, thereby enhancing their freedom to choose their path in life. I cannot think of a more practical expression of anarchism within the “real world” that we inhabit today.